Coming back after watching this and all the following incarnations of Inspector Gadget (whether it be the Gadget Boy, Gadget & the Gadgetinis, or that weird educational anthropology series), I've come to the stance that Inspector Gadget really isn't for me.
I never exactly got behind the general concept of the series with Gadget himself being a bumbling robotic detective while the people aroun... Read more
Coming back after watching this and all the following incarnations of Inspector Gadget (whether it be the Gadget Boy, Gadget & the Gadgetinis, or that weird educational anthropology series), I've come to the stance that Inspector Gadget really isn't for me.
I never exactly got behind the general concept of the series with Gadget himself being a bumbling robotic detective while the people around him do all the work behind his back. I never usually found Inspector Gadget to be that funny or charming to justify his usual obliviousness and antics in any of the shows I watched. It got old for me really fast and the series ended up being really tiring for me. Looking back, I wish Inspector Gadget himself was more like Wallace from Aardman's _Wallace & Gromit_ shorts. Both characters are pretty adjacent to each other, mechanical marvels that get into constant trouble only for their pet dog (or piers depending on which incarnation of Gadget your watching) to find a way to get out of it. What makes me like Wallace way more is that while he is pretty airheaded and usually causes the main conflict, he's an extremely well-meaning and charming character on his own who mostly has his heart in the right place. I never get tired of Wallace's antics because he's never tiring to watch. Compare that to Inspector Gadget. Gadget is also a very dimwitted character blessed with being a technological marvel, but he's also an overconfident and prideful character, usually putting down others offering to help or aid him to show how much more of an "expert" he is only for his work to be served on a silver platter for him by those same people unbeknownst to him. Traditionally these kinds of characters get some sort of comeuppance as comedic backfire, but the formula the series runs on has it the complete opposite way where its Gadget that causes constant turmoil to the characters around him, whether it be handing back Chief Quimby's exploding messages, always mistaking M.A.D agents as alleys and getting them unintentionally hurt, or mistaking Brain _for_ a M.A.D agent, and always walking away with a pat on the back for "job well done". That also would be fine as long as Inspector Gadget would be an entertaining and charming character beyond his unintentional mishaps, but he never really is for me. He's like if you sucked the charm out of Wallace and he became as much of a burden for the audience as he is for the characters around him. Wallace is not impervious to his own doings, whether intentional or not, so I don't exactly get behind Gadget's thick as mud plot armor when he's a much less enjoyable character. That pretty much goes for the other versions of the character as well in Gadget Boy, Gadget & the Gadgetinis, and the 2015 reboot to _lesser_ extents, but it's really the original series I wanted to focus this point on the most.Show less
